Jelly Doughnuts!

“Mmmmm…doughnuts” Homer Simpson.

Today is Friday, and I am in charge of bringing in the doughnuts (or donuts if you prefer) and bagels for everyone in the office.

Today it turns out that the jelly doughnuts and bagels have switched metaphoric states.

M57LRGBa(500).jpg (44902 bytes)

Credit: Alson Wong (http://www.alsonwongastro.com/m57-ring.htm)

Most of my pictures look like my friend Alson Wong’s image above.  (Alson, I needed to borrow yours because I can’t find mine, thanks).  You could always see that there was some material in the center  portion, but it was thought to be the expanding matter blown off from the central star.

A core disc of dark, smokey blue crossed with wisps of violet and ringed with all the colors of the rainbow before exploding into shells of red gasses streaking out across the stars

However, a new image by Hubble has lead team leader C. Robert O’Dell of Vanderbilt University to state that: “The nebula is not like a bagel, but rather, it’s like a jelly doughnut, because it’s filled with material in the middle.”

One of the reasons that the ring nebula is so interesting, is because it is a prelude to what could happen with our Sun.  Although the star at the center of the ring was much larger than our Sun, it should end up in a similar fate.  Blowing of material and becoming a white dwarf.  From millions of times the size of the Earth, to about the same size (although a lot hotter and denser).

Someone once asked me why I keep taking images that everyone else has already imaged.  The answer, of course, is you never know what you will find.  Many new discoveries in space happen because of directed research by professionals (like this one), but a good amount of discoveries happen because some amateur astronomer was imaging the same thing and something new showed up.

RTMC_CLogoJ.jpg (9992 bytes)

We have only been peering at the heavens seriously for about 400 years.  We tracked the stars way before that, but serious, scientific inquiry is only about 400 years old.  The star that formed the ring is relatively young in comparison, the event happened about 4,000 years ago and will go on for another 10,000 years or so.

BIG PLUG for RTMC.

This weekend, if you want to learn more about astronomy, how to make your own telescope, view the night sky.  The RTMC Astronomy Expo is being held near Big Bear California this weekend.  Go here for more information.  I’ll be there and I’m sure that the will be jelly doughnuts….mmmmmm.

– Ex astris, scientia –

I am and avid amateur astronomer and intellectual property attorney in Pasadena, California. As a former Chief Petty Officer in the U.S. Navy, I am a proud member of the Armed Service Committee of the Los Angeles County Bar Association working to aid all active duty and veterans in our communities. Connect with me on Google +

Norman

Cooperation to avoid litigation.

Rosetta Stone Inc. and Google Inc. have announced plans to dismiss a three-year old trademark infringement lawsuit over Google’s AdWords system. The two companies  now plan to work together to fight trademark abuse online.

Rosetta Stone filed suit in 2009, alleging that Google allowed its competitors to market copycat software when Rosetta’s trademarks were used as search terms in Google’s AdWords system. “Google’s search engine is helping third parties to mislead consumers and misappropriate the Rosetta Stone marks by using them as ‘keyword’ triggers for paid advertisements and by using them within the text or title of paid advertisements,” Rosetta Stone alleged.

As the Associated Press reports, the lawsuit was dismissed in 2010. However, it was scheduled to resume this year after an appeals court ruled that some of the claims should go to trial.

In a statement, Rosetta Stone and Google pledged to “meaningfully collaborate to combat online ads for counterfeit goods and prevent the misuse and abuse of trademarks on the Internet.”

“By working together, Google and Rosetta Stone hope to improve detection methods, and better protect from abuse brands like Rosetta Stone, advertising platforms like Google AdWords, and ultimately consumers on the Internet,” they continued. “At the end of the day, both companies would rather cooperate than litigate, and we believe this agreement is an important step toward eliminating piracy and trademark abuse on the Internet.”

In this case, it appears that Google and Rosetta Stone have decided that it may be more cost-effective to pool their resources against a common enemy as opposed to the time and expense of trial. However, it is likely that this was just one of the factors taken into consideration when settling the lawsuit, as other terms of the settlement have not been disclosed.

How Can I Help?

If you need help to protect a brand, file a trademark application, or know someone that can use my help, please contact me for a free 30 minute consultation at nvantreeck@usip.com or call TOLL FREE at 1-855-UR IDEAS (1-855-874-3327) and ask for Norman.

– Ex astris, scientia –

I am and avid amateur astronomer and intellectual property attorney in Pasadena, California. As a former Chief Petty Officer in the U.S. Navy, I am a proud member of the Armed Service Committee of the Los Angeles County Bar Association working to aid all active duty and veterans in our communities. Connect with me on Google +

Norman

Space Pizza.

No delivery needed, and its not DiGiorno.  NASA has unveiled plans to print pizza in space.  That right, printed pizza.

The RepRap self-replicating printer 'Mendel". (Credit: CharlesC under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license).

I have probably mentioned once or twice on this blog how I love 3D printing.  3D printing has been in the news a lot lately when someone figured out that you could print a functioning plastic gun that would pass through security. Not the best use of the technology, but predictable.

A much better use has been chocolate (and other extrudable materials) for making fantastic food.

Picking up on this theme, NASA has awarded a $125,000 grant to the Systems & Materials Research Cooperation to design a 3D printer capable of printing a pizza from 30-year shelf stable foodstuffs.  SMRC built a basic food printer from a 3D chocolate printer to win the grant.  The design is based on an open-source RepRap 3D printer (shown above).  The 3D printer would “build-up” a pizza serving by first layering out the dough onto a heated plate then adding tomato sauce and toppings.  Mmmmmm….Pizza.

So instead of plastic containers of food, members of the International Space Station will be dinning on pizza in 2014.  There are a few problems to solve, such as zero g printing, but the upside is huge.

The ISS and other long term missions would only need to carry quantities of food material and have dinner printed.  Sort of like a poor mans replicator.

beermug

Now if they could only print beer, everything would be perfect!

– Ex astris, scientia –

I am and avid amateur astronomer and intellectual property attorney in Pasadena, California. As a former Chief Petty Officer in the U.S. Navy, I am a proud member of the Armed Service Committee of the Los Angeles County Bar Association working to aid all active duty and veterans in our communities. Connect with me on Google +

Norman

USPTO Issues Guide for Filing Preissuance Submissions Electronically

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office recently released a guide for filing preissuance submissions electronically via its EFS Web system. The guide is intended to make it easier for third parties to submit printed publications of potential relevance to the patentability of another’s claimed invention under the preissuance submission provision of the America Invents Act.

A preissuance submission must be timely filed, in writing, and contain:

  • A list identifying the items being submitted;
  • A concise description of the relevance of each item listed;
  • A legible copy of each non-U.S. patent document listed;
  • An English language translation of any non-English language item listed;
  • A statement by the party making the submission that the submission complies with the statute and the rule; and
  • The required fee.

Although the USPTO accepts submissions filed by paper or electronically, the agency encourages the use of electronic submissions via EFS Web. According to the USPTO, the EFS Web guides a third party through the content requirements for a preissuance submission to ensure that the third party makes a compliant submission. The system also calculates the timeliness of the submission to determine whether the submission is being made during permitted statutory time window.

To encourage the use of electronic filing, the USPTO has created an EFS Web Quick Start Guide. This guide outlines the steps that a third party must follow to make an electronic submission.

, we also encourage you to contact us today by phone or email to schedule your free 30-minute consultation.

How Can I Help?

As the world becomes more interconnected, protecting your intellectual property in foreign countries can be the key to business success. To find out more about the PPH and other tools available to protect your IP overseas, contact me today for a free consultation.

If you need help to protect or patent your ideas and need to do it as fast as possible, or know someone that can use my help, please contact me for a free 30 minute consultation at nvantreeck@usip.com or call TOLL FREE at 1-855-UR IDEAS (1-855-874-3327) and ask for Norman.

– Ex astris, scientia –

I am and avid amateur astronomer and intellectual property attorney in Pasadena, California.  As a former Chief Petty Officer in the U.S. Navy, I am a proud member of the Armed Service Committee of the Los Angeles County Bar Association working to aid all active duty and veterans in our communities. Connect with me on Google +

Norman

I am and avid amateur astronomer and intellectual property attorney in Pasadena, California. As a former Chief Petty Officer in the U.S. Navy, I am a proud member of the Armed Service Committee of the Los Angeles County Bar Association working to aid all active duty and veterans in our communities. Connect with me on Google +

Norman

Small PhoneSats the next big thing?

Yesterday, I told you about the 1st ever crowd sourced satellite, the Skycube.  I turns out however, that Sunday NASA also launched three low-cost smartphone satellites aboard the maiden flight of Orbital Science Corp.’s Antares rocket.

The PhoneSats are transmitting data packets on the amateur radio spectrum.  You can see what data is being transmitted by the Phonesats here. If you are an amateur radio operator and you can help the project by submitting them to NASA (go citizen scientists!). The dashboard page will give you all the information you need to track the satellites in real time.

(memegenerator.net)

The two PhoneSat 1.0 satellites, Graham and Bell, transmit signal every 28 and 30 seconds respectively.  A new PhoneSat 2.0 test satellite, Alexander, transmits every 25 seconds.  You need to hurry, the satellites are only expected to remain in orbit for about two weeks before de-orbiting to a fiery death.

The goal of the PhoneSat missions are to determine if off the shelf smartphones, or smartphone components, can be used as the main flight avionics of a capable, yet very inexpensive, satellite.  Much like the Spirit and Opportunity rovers on Mars (who both exceeded their original missions by a long time).

The PhoneSats already have many of the systems needed for a satellite, including fast processors, versatile operating systems, multiple miniature sensors, high-resolution cameras, GPS receivers and several radios.

“Smartphones offer a wealth of potential capabilities for flying small, low-cost, powerful satellites for atmospheric or Earth science, communications, or other space-born applications. They also may open space to a whole new generation of commercial, academic and citizen-space users.”

Images taken with the Phonesats will be transmitted back to Earth in smaller packets.  These packets will, hopefully, be received by amateur radio operators around the world.

NASA engineers kept the total cost of the components for the three prototype satellites in the PhoneSat project under $7,000 using mostly commercial hardware. The hardware used for this mission is the Google-HTC Nexus One smartphone running the Android operating system.  I wonder if there is now going to be a bidding war by other manufactures to make their claim to space capable smartphones.  The engineers did have to modify the phones for use in space by adding a larger, external lithium-ion battery bank (no recharging in orbit, also it seems that it would be trivial to add a solar battery charger) and a more powerful radio (no cell towers for miles, literally) to send messages and data from space back to Earth.

I wonder if I can send my own phone into space? I do know people with rockets capable of sub-orbital flight. Hmmm…more importantly, I wonder if my insurance will cover the replacement cost of the phone.

– Ex astris, scientia –

I am and avid amateur astronomer and intellectual property attorney in Pasadena, California. As a former Chief Petty Officer in the U.S. Navy, I am a proud member of the Armed Service Committee of the Los Angeles County Bar Association working to aid all active duty and veterans in our communities. Connect with me on Google +

Norman

A haunting case.

It’s a little early for Halloween, but the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided a trademark lawsuit last year about the Winchester Mystery House in San Jose, California.

The house belonged to Sarah Winchester, the widow of famous gun maker William Winchester. According to the story, Sarah was told by a medium that the family was being haunted by those killed by Winchester rifles. The medium instructed Sarah that the only way to keep her family safe was to move West and build a house for the ghosts.

So long as construction on the house continued, Sarah and her family would be safe, according to the medium. Construction continued 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year for the next 38 years, only ending when Sarah died in 1922. At her death, the mansion contained 160 rooms, 2,000 doors, 10,000 windows, 47 stairways, 47 fireplaces, 13 bathrooms, and 6 kitchens.

Given the backstory, it is not surprising that the mansion is now owned by Winchester Mystery House, LLC and serves as a tourist attraction. The company filed a trademark infringement lawsuit after Global Asylum, Inc. released a direct to DVD film called Haunting of Winchester House without a license to use the mark and the story.

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently confirmed that the film company was protected under the First Amendment, relying heavily on the precedent established in Rogers v. Grimaldi. The first prong of the Rogers test requires only that the title pass “the appropriately low threshold of minimal artistic relevance” to the content of the film. In this case, the court found that both the title “Haunting of Winchester House” and the Victorian-style mansion on the DVD cover have some artistic relevance to the underlying work. In its opinion, the court noted that “caretakers move into the house built by Sarah Winchester, and her ghost and the ghosts of those killed by Winchester weapons are characters in the film.”

With regard to the second prong of the Rogers test, the Sixth Circuit concluded that the title and the cover of the DVD do not “explicitly mislead as to the source or content of the work.” As the court highlighted, “There is no suggestion that the film was authorized, endorsed, or produced by plaintiff. The cover art to the film does not contain the phrase ‘Winchester Mystery House’ or ‘Winchester Mystery House, LLC.’”

How Can I Help?

If you need help to protect a brand, file a trademark application, or know someone that can use my help, please contact me for a free 30 minute consultation at nvantreeck@usip.com or call TOLL FREE at 1-855-UR IDEAS (1-855-874-3327) and ask for Norman.

– Ex astris, scientia –

I am and avid amateur astronomer and intellectual property attorney in Pasadena, California. As a former Chief Petty Officer in the U.S. Navy, I am a proud member of the Armed Service Committee of the Los Angeles County Bar Association working to aid all active duty and veterans in our communities. Connect with me on Google +

Norman

SkyCube Lives!

The ambitious folks that run Southern Stars have finished work on their Skycube project.

Last summer they raised over $116,000 in a Kickstarter campaign to build the diminutive satellite.  The project raised about $34,000 more than was needed to make and launch the satellite.  This allowed the team to make a twin Skycube in case of any mishaps.  This marks the first space mission designed and funded by amateur astronomers and others.

The satellite is now sitting Houston awaiting its launch on the SpaceX CRS-3 mission to the International Space Station on November 28th, 2013.  The SkyCube will be deployed from ISS approximately two weeks later.

Once in orbit, SkyCube will let you send simple broadcasts – “tweets from space” – that amateur radio operators around the world can hear, and anyone with a smart phone can follow.  You will be able to request images of Earth from the cameras aboard the satellite, using the Satellite Safari app on your iOS or Android device.

At the end of its 90-day mission, SkyCube will inflate an onboard balloon.  The balloon will make SkyCube visible to the unaided eyes, and de-orbit the satellite cleanly through atmospheric drag, ending the mission in a fiery grand finale that avoids any buildup of space debris (unlike some other missions still stuck in orbit….ESA heeellooo?).

Don’t worry if you didn’t have time or didn’t know about the Kickstarter, you can still participate and send space tweets and/or take pictures from the Skycube and help fund the next mission.  Go here to purchase a tweet/image package.  They make some awesome astronomy apps and telescope control hardware as well.

Because of the timing of the launch and deployment, a package would be a great gift for someone (or yourself).  Just think, being able to take a live image, from space, on your smartphone!!!  The only thing missing is the Kickstarter to purchase the ISS before they decommission it in 2020.  I just need to figure out how many pictures I want to take!

Remember, just because there are billions being spent on the commercialization of space, it doesn’t mean that you can’t have a part in history.

– Ex astris, scientia –

I am and avid amateur astronomer and intellectual property attorney in Pasadena, California. As a former Chief Petty Officer in the U.S. Navy, I am a proud member of the Armed Service Committee of the Los Angeles County Bar Association working to aid all active duty and veterans in our communities. Connect with me on Google +

Norman

Microsoft supports End Anonymous Patents Act

In a strange twist, Microsoft has thrown its support for a recently introduced bill titled “End Anonymous Patents Act,” introduced by House of Representatives member Ted Deutch (D-Fla.)

The act, if passed, would supposedly solve a problem regarding the recordation of patents in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.  Currently, recording the owner of a patent is voluntary.

Microsoft’s general counsel stated that:

Some patent owners take advantage of this obscurity to try to hide what they own for tactical advantage in licensing negotiations or to avoid complying with patent licensing commitments.

This is rather ironic considering that Microsoft has used anonymous patents for years to threaten both the Open Source community and now anyone producing an Android device.

To show it is serious, Microsoft launched its own web based Patent Tracker that allows anyone to quickly view and search through all of the patents that the company currently holds.

However, Microsoft has refused to divulge what patents it owns that “scare” handset makers in to licensing Microsoft’s portfolio, or those patents that it has licensed to other companies.

Currently, Microsoft makes more money from patent licenses on Android phones that it has made in total for its own brand of phones.  They are in fact becoming one of the world’s largest patent licensing entities, and in many cases, a non-practicing entity (or patent troll by some definitions).

This apparent transparency about face, is nothing more that smoke and mirrors, and is not the solution to the problem.

In fact, Microsoft can easily skirt the new bill by transferring their patents to patent assertion entities (i.e trolls) to attack their competitors.

Microsoft has strong ties with Intellectual Ventures, Rockstar and MOSAID, three of the world’s largest patent trolls.  When Microsoft transfers its patents to these trolls, Microsoft is no longer identified as the  “owner” of the patent.  So the recordation required by the new law does nothing to protect other companies from a shakedown and does not list Microsoft as the recorded owner.  Very convenient.

For example, Microsoft transferred more than 2,000 wireless patents from Nokia to MOSAID in 2011. Microsoft’s new “transparent” patent trackinging software will not show these patents because they don’t technically own the patents or control MOSAID.  However, Microsoft will benefit from the transfer because they and Nokia still maintain the ability to reclaim control over the patents transferred if MOSAID fails to satisfy preset revenue targets.

But don’t think Microsoft is alone in this endeavor.  In a similar fashion, Rockstar Consortium, Inc,formed by Microsoft, Apple, Ericsson and others, is now one of the largest patent trolls in the world, with more than 4,000 patents acquired the collapse and bankruptcy of Nortel.

A better bill to put before Congress would require companies to disclosure not only patent ownership, but patent royalties recieved from a particular patent (i.e. A companies patent “interest”) and a stiff penalties to companies that participate in patent privateering.  But with all the large companies that have become patent trolls themselves (while crying about the bad effects that patent trolls have on the economy), there isn’t any real change on the horizon.

How Can I Help?

If you need help to patent an idea, or protect  yourself from a claim of patent infringement, or know someone that can use my help, please contact me for a free 30 minute consultation at nvantreeck@usip.com or call TOLL FREE at 1-855-UR IDEAS (1-855-874-3327) and ask for Norman.

– Ex astris, scientia –

I am and avid amateur astronomer and intellectual property attorney in Pasadena, California. As a former Chief Petty Officer in the U.S. Navy, I am a proud member of the Armed Service Committee of the Los Angeles County Bar Association working to aid all active duty and veterans in our communities. Connect with me on Google +

Norman

What can you learn from a grain of sand?

Two grains actually.  Scientists studying grains of sand carried to earth in meteorites found in Antarctica have been able to determine information about how our solar system was formed.

This method of studying stars can provide information that can’t be found with traditional astronomical means using telescopes or other observations.

Two tiny grains of silica (SiO2), the most common component of sand, were found in primitive meteorites.  What makes these two grains of sand interesting is the fact that silica is not one of the minerals expected to be found from when our solar system condensed from a dust cloud from a previous nova or supernova.

Most of the material that makes up our solar system came from red giants.  We know this because of the isotopic composition found everywhere we have looked in the area. Different stars produce different amounts of isotopes.  Our solar system has a homogenous isotopic composition.

The two grains, however, are believed to have originated from a core-collapse supernova.  Most grains of sand previously found were rich in oxygen-17, which indicates that they probably came from a red giant or AGB stars. But these grains contained oxygen-18, which meant they came from a core-collapse supernova, not a red giant. Also, the two grains were found from two different meteor, but have similar isotopic compositions.  This indicates that the grains of sand may have come from the same supernova.

A massive star that will explode at the end of its life, a core-collapse supernova has a layered structure rather like that of an onion.  Our Sun will not end up like that.  It doesn’t have enough mass to blow sky high, so to speak.

Oh, the things you find in the sand.

– Ex astris, scientia –

I am and avid amateur astronomer and intellectual property attorney in Pasadena, Californai. As a former Chief Petty Officer in the U.S. Navy, I am a proud member of the Armed Service Committee of the Los Angeles County Bar Association working to aid all active duty and veterans in our communities. Connect with me on Google +

Norman

Trademark Solicitation Warnings

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has reissued its warning about fraudulent trademarking solicitations purporting to be official communications from the agency.  The USPTO website now provides direct links to 13 examples of the non-USPTO solicitations about which the agency has received complaints within the past several months.

As I previously highlighted on this blog, private companies not associated with the USPTO are using trademark application and registration information from the USPTO’s databases to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations, which may include offers: (1) for legal services; (2) for trademark monitoring services; (3) to record trademarks with U.S. Customs and Border Protection; and (4) to “register” trademarks in the company’s own private registry.

Given the growing incidence of these scams, the USPTO encourages applicants and registrants to read trademark-related communications carefully before making a decision about whether to respond.  In addition, it points out that all official correspondence will be from the “United States Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, VA, and if by e-mail, specifically from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

While some of the correspondence you receive regarding your intellectual property may be legitimate, I encourage you to consult with an attorney before enrolling in these services or sending any money.

How Can I Help?

If you need help to protect a brand, file a trademark application, or know someone that can use my help, please contact me for a free 30 minute consultation at nvantreeck@usip.com or call TOLL FREE at 1-855-UR IDEAS (1-855-874-3327) and ask for Norman.

– Ex astris, scientia –

I am and avid amateur astronomer and intellectual property attorney in Pasadena, California. As a former Chief Petty Officer in the U.S. Navy, I am a proud member of the Armed Service Committee of the Los Angeles County Bar Association working to aid all active duty and veterans in our communities. Connect with me on Google +

Norman